A study funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation on the New York City law requiring chain restaurants to include calorie counts on menu labels has delivered its first set of results. It would seem that the number of calories consumed/purchased has not decreased among lower-income residents.

Nearly 28 percent of purchasers reported seeing the calorie labeling information, and almost 90 percent of this group reported that they purchased fewer calories as a result. However, the researchers found that the number of calories purchased in New York City actually increased slightly, from a mean of 825 calories to 846 calories. The authors concluded that calorie labeling increased the percentage of consumers from lower-income, minority communities who reported seeing calorie labels, and subsequently the number of consumers who reported that the information influenced their food choices.

My guess is that this New York City law that requires calorie counts to appear next to menu items largely helps those that are already focused on dieting and losing weight, while those that are not dieting and perhaps don’t care so much about the number of calories in their meals simply ignore or are not even aware of the information they are looking at.

However the law needs more time to evolve and create a greater awareness before any study has results that are truly helpful and realistic, as this study may have started too soon after the initial implementation of the law.

Via Marc Ambinder.

Ta-Nehisi Coates in his Atlantic Magazine blog quotes from Ezra Klein on obesity’s role in poverty and how they are intertwined and influence each other.

Klein says:

Obesity is bad, but it may be just one of many bad things. Overdue bills. A horrible part-time job. Endless commuting time on the bus. A mother with diabetes. A child running with the wrong crowd. A leaking roof. In that scenario, slowly reversing your weight gain might be a good idea, but it hardly makes a dent in the overall crumminess of the conditions. It won’t replace pain with pleasure. So you do things that are surer to replace pain with pleasure, like have a delicious, filling, satisfying, salty, fatty meal. That may make your overall situation more unpleasant, but then, making that situation pleasant didn’t seem like an option in the first place.”

And Coates comments:

It’s a lot easier to drop that 30 when everything else is going well, as opposed to when you’re worried about the kid’s school, your ability to make rent, and the fools on the corner.

Unfortunately, this is probably all true.

(Via The Atlantic Magazine.)